Whole Loaf Immigration Policy Evolves
The problem is our GOP senators have misidentified the loaf.
The "whole loaf" isn't "comprehensive" immigration reform. The whole loaf is the whole border is shut down and the whole U.S. business environment requires legal workers everywhere under the threat of draconian penalties against employers who hire illegal aliens.
Republicans better try to do something:
Top Republicans are planning a series of tough new border-security measures that they hope can get through the Senate, which in the past has opposed border-security legislation unless it has included a guest-worker program and grants citizenship rights to the estimated 12 million to 20 million illegal aliens already here.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Tennessee Republican, said yesterday it would be "next to impossible" to approve such comprehensive immigration reform, but several key senators said they are willing to consider a border-security-only approach.
"If our only options are a half a loaf or no loaf, then I'd be inclined to take half a loaf," said Sen. John Cornyn, the Texas Republican who for years has been a leading advocate of comprehensive immigration reform that secures the borders....
House Republicans say they get little credit for having approved a border-security bill 10 months ago and the Republican Congress as a whole gets little credit for the border-security improvements that have passed both chambers.
The latest bill to fund the Iraq war, for instance, contained $1.9 billion for beefed up border patrol. And by year's end, Congress is expected to have approved another $20 billion.
The sticking point for border-security legislation has been a handful of Senate Republicans who sided with most Democrats to oppose any immigration bill that doesn't include a guest-worker program and provisions to grant citizenship to the majority of the illegal alien population.
Some, however, are having second thoughts as the November midterm elections near.
"If all we could get through is border security and work-site enforcement, I could support that," Mr. Cornyn said yesterday....
Sen. Sam Brownback of Kansas has been another stalwart Republican opposed to the border-security-only approach. But yesterday, he said he's "not sure" how he would vote on such a bill now.
"I'd like to see us do something. I'd like to see us do something comprehensive," he said. "But I would look at it."
Even Sen. Mel Martinez, the Florida Republican who wrote the compromise bill that ultimately passed the Senate, has softened to the idea.
"It really would depend on what it looked like," he said yesterday.
Such legislation could also pick up a few Democrats. A handful already have expressed public support for a straight border-security bill. And yesterday, Sen. Mark Pryor, the Arkansas Democrat who has supported comprehensive legislation, said yesterday he would consider a border bill.
Mr. Martinez acknowledged that, without a major immigration bill passing both chambers, Republicans have a problem on their hands heading into November.
"It was a serious risk when we left here in July with this cocky attitude that this would be a better political issue for us if we get nothing done on it," he said. "That was a real mistake."
That vulnerability was clear yesterday with Mr. Frist's "next to impossible" statement about comprehensive reform.
Within hours, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat who has been on the forefront of immigration reform, issued a statement.
"How can Republicans say they are for making America safer when they can't even pass a comprehensive immigration-reform bill to protect our borders?
Apart from reminding us why no one should EVER VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT ANYTIME, ANYWHERE, this news item also impresses upon us the need to have better Republicans running for office.
THAT is the major malfunction in American politics.
We know where Ted Kennedy wants to take us. We know Bill Frist and Sam Brownback are trying to lead us down the same garden path. They're all living in gated communities and they want us to suck up the fact that our neighborhood quality of life is declining daily.
They better take the "half loaf." And they better realize the rest of the loaf is to finish the job on border security and worker IDs.
And I'm not talking about Bill Frist or any of the others who voted for S.2611. They are goners. Frist's presidential dreams are toast. I'm talking about the few Republican senators who still have some credibility on the immigration issue. Their only loaf is to fix the problem and end the influx of illegal aliens.
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Whole Loaf Immigration Policy Evolves.
TrackBack URL for this entry: